Book #5: Night Shift (1978)

So here we are, ready to start book #5.

I've got very high hopes for this one, as it's my first go at one of Stephen King's short story collections.  I've heard that he's often at his best when he writes short stories, and after my distaste with Rage,  I could use a little bit of awesome.

I had thought I wasn't familiar with this book at all, but perusing the story titles and I'm seeing a lot of familiar names.  While I'm pretty sure I've never read any of them, I'm aware of several by reputation.  Quitters, Inc, Children of the Corn, and Sometimes They Come Back, stand out, and Jerusalem's Lot has got to be a sequel/prequel/spinoff of Salem's Lot.  

I'm actually giddy at the prospect of returning to the world of Salem's Lot.

I don't usually do much research about a book before reading it, as I want to avoid spoilers as much as possible.  However, I did peruse wikipedia briefly and saw that stories in this book have been adapted to feature films five times, four television adaptations and well over a dozen "Dollar Baby" student films.  That's quite the legacy.

Most of these short stories were written in the decade or so prior to the publication of this collection, so I'll forgo the usual historical context, as it's probably not as applicable here.

So, lets begin.

Book #5
Night Shift
Publication date: February, 1978

Rage (1977) - Review

Well, as I said in my previous post, it was bound to happen.

I didn't like Rage.  I didn't hate it, ultimately, as there were some interesting ideas, but for the most part, it seems like the work of an angry kid who scrawled his thoughts down on a bloody napkin after getting beat up on the playground...again.

It lacks the purposeful focus and confident voice that I first noticed in 'Salem's Lot and really noticed in The Shining.  A novel written from this angry perspective could have been cool if that anger had been focused, but it isn't.

Then again, maybe that was the point.  Perhaps King was well aware that a novel like this could never be published by Stephen King: best selling novelist, but would fly under the radar if written by an unknown paperback novelist, such as Richard Bachman.  The fatalistic ending also seems to be something that King (at least from the sample size I've seen so far) might not have attempted.  Maybe.

Lending credence to that theory is the fact that, while this novel has been "connected" with various real world school shootings, it should be noted that none of those events happened until 1988.  Stephen King was very publicly revealed to be writing under the pseudonym Richard Bachman in 1985 and The Bachman Books was published under King's name later that year.

I'm not particularly squeamish, so the idea of a novel centering around the perpetrator of a school shooting that left two teachers dead of gunshot wounds didn't deter me.  I just didn't particularly care for the main character.  And reading page after page about somebody you don't care about can become an exercise in tedium.

I do have a thought however, even if it isn't terribly clever or original.  King was apparently invested in Richard Bachman for the long haul.  He had intended to continue to use the moniker indefinitely, possibly for the rest of his career and was quite upset when he was discovered.  Add that to the fact that he wasn't particularly happy when Thinner, which was out when the King/Bachman connection was made, went from selling 40,000 copies to 400,000.  He took pleasure in his little secret side project.  And it was likely an outlet for him.

So my thought is...is Stephen King still writing under a secret pseudonym?  A new one?  He's publicly stated that he would never do it again.  But you would expect him to say that, after having been recently "outed", especially if he was planning to do it again.  Can't have people looking too closely.

That said, I find it highly unlikely that,  if he were writing under a different, unknown, name, that he wouldn't have been discovered.  He somehow managed to go undetected as Bachman for nearly eight years before being discovered.  Mainly because the writing styles and settings (Maine, Maine and more Maine) were so similar.  I'm actually surprised it took that long.  While, (as I wrote in my previous post) the voice of this book seems different than King's usual, the actual writing style is so similar it almost screams "HEY EVERYBODY!  I'M STEPHEN KING".

Certain phrases and habits I've noticed King uses frequently.  Such as, at least one character peeing themselves.  Maine.  The repetitive habit that becomes almost a mantra such as Jack Torrance's wiping of the lips in The Shining. Weird metaphors and similes that I've only ever seen King use: "jackstraws in the wind", and comparing people's skin color to "milk".

So maybe in this Twitter world, it would be impossible for King to write under a secret identity again and remain secret.

But hey, a fella can dream.

So, not my favorite.  Didn't like it.  But I wouldn't say I hated it either.  But I could definitely use a really good palate cleanser.  Hopefully, Night Shift won't disappoint.

It was bound to happen...

I hate to say it, but it was bound to happen:  it's obvious to me that Rage just isn't for me.

I don't like it.  At all.

This isn't a full review.  I'll post that on Saturday, but I do want to make a few observations/comments.

As I began reading, I thought at first that maybe this book was fine...just not suited for my tastes.  But the more I read, the more I'm convinced that it's just not very good.

I wanted to like it.  I really did.  As I read more about King's reasoning for publishing under Bachman, I really started digging the concept.

As to why I'm not digging it?  I have a few theories, but not sure exactly why.  Maybe it's a combination of some or all of the following:

1. Different voice.  It really feels different.  Angrier.  Moodier.  But without the steady, sure confidence in his other novels.  This is either intentional on the part of the author, or unintentional and merely a byproduct of having been written earlier, before King had fully developed his writer's toolbox.  I had really begun to appreciate King's voice and it seems like it's absence is sorely missed.
2. Lack of a compelling main character.  I say main character, rather than "protagonist" because the central character doesn't need to be a good guy.  He doesn't have to be likeable, necessarily.  I don't even necessarily need to cheer for the main character.  But, if you're going to go the route of an unlikable, unrelatable main character without any discernable goal or quest...then that character has to be incredibly interesting and compelling in some other way.  And I just don't find Charlie particularly interesting.  Just a whining little brat.
3. The entire premise.  A student walks into a classroom, shoots and kills the teacher in front of the class, then shoots and kills another teacher a few minutes later...and the students just kinda shrug, and start playing psychologist with each other?  It's hard to imagine that the students wouldn't have stampeded out of that room, or out the windows or whatever.  Sure, the novel is set in 1976, but I just have a hard time buying the concept that high school students in 1976 would have been so "whatever, dude, lets talk" about the whole thing.
4. Unbelievable coincidences.  A sniper tries to shoot Charlie and succeeds!  But don't worry.  Charlie's just fine.  A padlock in his breast pocket saved him.  Uh huh.
5. It feels raw.  And not raw in a "powerful, visceral" way, or raw in a "raw vegetables wholesomeness" way.  But raw in an "inedible, uncooked meat" kind of way.

I wish I didn't feel this way, but this one just isn't doing it for me.  Maybe it will turn it around in the next few chapters, but I'm not keeping my hopes up.

-B

Settling into a format.

For those interested in such things, I think I've finally ironed out how I will proceed.

I will continue to read as much as time allows (hey, I still gotta earn a living), but I want to go with a bit more structured format for the blog.

Going forward, things will be conducted on a weekly schedule.  I'll post about the new book I'll be reading that week on Sunday with the review about that book on the following Saturday.  As time allows (and as whimsy strikes me), during that week,  I'll have small observations or questions/discussions about the book I'm reading.

I believe I'll be able to get through quite a few books using the single week time frame.

However, for the larger books (I'm looking at you, The Stand, It, Under the Dome, Desperation, to name a few), then the time frame will be lengthened to two (or more...) weeks, with the review appearing on a Saturday.

For those longer books, I'll suspect the mid week posts might be a little longer or meatier, as I'll have a lot more material to ruminate.

-B

The Shining (1977) - Review

The Shining is another big one.  Ask any Stephen King fan, be it casual or a hard core constant reader for a top 5 list of King novels and this one is likely up there.

Plus there's the legendary Kubrick film, which is one of my favorites.

I was afraid the novel might not live up to the hype.

I'm happy to say it was wrong.  This book was incredible in its realistic portrayal of a small (very) struggling family's attempt to survive, both metaphorically and literally.

In many ways, it is a very intimate book, focusing mainly on the three members of the Torrance family: Jack, his wife Wendy, and their five year old son, Danny.

The Torrances have their share of family secrets.  Jack is a recovering alcoholic with an enormous temper.  Wendy has serious self esteem issues (whether she's aware of it or not) stemming from her very judgmental (and generally awful) mother.  And Danny just "knows things."  And can read thoughts.  Kind of.

Danny shines.

I won't bore you with a blow by blow of this book, since it's so well known.  Basically, Jack's drinking and self destructive behavior (he got himself fired from a promising teaching job) and abusive behavior (he "accidentally" broke Danny's arm two years earlier) has strained their marriage to the breaking point.

He's given one last shot at redemption: become the winter caretaker for the Overlook hotel, a destination so secluded in the mountains that it's unreachable about 4 months of the year.  The isolation would give him plenty of time to finally finish his play as well as patch things up with Wendy.  All their eggs were in this one final basket.

But the Overlook has plans of it's own.

As I was reading, I found myself trying to "figure out" the Overlook. One thing that really sets this book apart from other haunted house type stories is the Overlook itself has an agenda.  It isn't just a screaming phantasm, or an old spirit that has lost its way.

It seems to be a living entity.  And it's hungry.  Best I can figure, is it feeds off of psychic energy.  Off of those that Shine.  So when Danny, who is described as shining like a spotlight rather than a mere flashlight or candle, is confined to the Overlook for the winter, the hotel begins to awaken...into something terrible.

The hotel works your mind.  Really gets into you and preys on your greatest fears.

The novel was deliberately paced and once the set pieces are established and things begin clicking in the final act...I could barely put the book down.

A couple nitpicks.  First...King's portrayal of the hotel is very scary and menacing...but at time's just bizarre.  There seems to be a gigantic party from the early 20s that keeps replaying within the hotel.  It's never really explained what's so special about this particular party.  Or maybe it's not the party that keeps "replaying" so much as the hotel is permanently "stuck" in a certain time.  Those things aren't fully explored.

And...while it's not fair, I'm going to mention it anyway.  I was disappointed that the phrase "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy" isn't in the novel.  Not even once.  It was wholly a creation of the movie.  Oh well.  Enough nitpicking.

I know that Stephen King to this day hates the Kubrick film adaptation, but there's plenty enough room in my heart for love of both.  I can see why King, something of a perfectionist, would have issues with the film version: for one thing, the final act is very different.

But also, the character of Jack, despite the legendary Nicholson performance, is a one note caricature performance in the movie. He show's up, kind of eccentric (hey, it is Nicholson only a few years removed from One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest) and then boom, he's crazy and tries to kill everybody.

There's a lot more going on with him in the book.  And there's something of a redemption for Jack, in the novel, in that he doesn't go crazy so much as he's possessed by the spirit of the hotel.  This leads to a very cool, tender moment at the end when Jack regains control of himself for just a moment...long enough to tell Danny he loves him and to RUN!...before his consciousness is gone forever.

This was a great one.  Well worth the hype, even nearly 40 years later.

Book #4: Rage (1977)

Well, four books in, and I've finally gotten to one that I am not familiar with at all.
Rage.

Well, I'm familiar with its reputation.  I know that, due to the content, King has chosen to let it go permanently out of print.  I don't know exactly why (I've chosen to not find out prior to reading) but I seem to recall it having to do with a school shooting.

So, lets get to it.


Historical Context
Publication Date: September 13, 1977
President: Jimmy Carter

World Series Winner 1977: New York Yankees over the Los Angeles Dodgers
Boston Red Sox Record 1977: 97-64

Cost of a new home:  $54,200.00  Cost of a new car:  $  Median Household Income:  $13,572.00  Cost of a first-class stamp:  $0.13  Cost of a gallon of regular gas:  $0.62  Cost of a dozen eggs:  $0.82  Cost of a gallon of Milk:  $1.68  Source Top #10 songs in the USA The Emotions - Best Of My Love Andy Gibb - I Just Want To Be Your Everything KC and the Sunshine Band - Keep It Comin' Love The Floaters - Float On Fleetwood Mac - Don't Stop James Taylor - Handy Man The Brothers Johnson - Strawberry Letter 23 Electric Light Orchestra - Telephone Line The Sanford/Townsend Band - Smoke From A Distant Fire The London Symphony Orchestra - Star Wars Main Title Source $1 in 1977 dollars = $4.06 in 2016 dollars Source

A question on the Meta side of things...

Finished the Shining.  Review in the next day or so.

I have a couple of questions that I've been mulling over the last couple days.

While I have not yet read any of the Dark Tower books (and hardly know anything about them), I do know (or think I know) that "everything is connected".  I recently asked a friend at what point the interconnected nature of everything starts happening.  He answered that it was pretty much "from the very beginning.  You won't realize until later, but everything he's written is game."  I'm paraphrasing, but that was the jist.

With that said, I have a few questions.

Three books in, I've met scary telekenetics, scary vampires, and not-as-scary precog/mind readers (Shiners). Dick Hallorann would occasionally meet others with the Shine.  So at least in The Shining, people are aware of other special people.

So...
1) Are Carrie White's powers considered "The Shine", just a different flavor, than Danny?  Or is she an entirely different animal?
2) Are other people aware of people with these powers?  Shining appears to be somewhat common.  Carrie was suggested to be unique (although at the very end of the book it's suggested a small girl named Annie --in the year 1988--had the same powers as Carrie).
3) The Overlook seems to be a very scary, but supernaturally significant place.  Is it a "one-off" or are there other significant places and does it "mean anything more?"

I'm sure I'll think of more as I progress.  And I'll be sure to post my thoughts.  Will be fun to re-read these thoughts later and see how many of these things are answered.

Obviously, these questions are more rhetorical than anything else, so I don't require any answers.  Unless you *really* want to, go ahead and leave a comment.  I would prefer no overt spoilers though, if it can be avoided.

-B

The Depth of the horror...

So our three main characters are in the thick of it now.  The snows have really started and Danny, Jack and Wendy are confined to the Overlook.

But enough about that.  I wanted to point out how struck I am with the depth and the layers to the horrifying things that King is setting up.

So much of what passes for "horror" these days amounts to little more than cheap scares and shallow terror.  Hell, "jump scares" are part of any good horror movie, but it seems like these days, most horror movies have little more to offer than a combination of jump scares and gore.

What King is doing here is presenting us with an onion of horror...and slowly peeling back the layers for us.  Okay, horrible analogy, but I'm sticking with it.

The horror isn't just physical.  It's also spiritual and psychological.  And it's multi-dimensional:  each character has their own personal terrors they're bringing with them to the Overlook.  And the Overlook is hungry.

Danny is afraid his parents will get DIVORCE.  And that his daddy is contemplating SUICIDE.  And that if he talks too much about the Shining and the things "he just knows" he'll be declared to have "LOSTHISMARBLES" and sent to the SANNYTARIUM.

He's got this incredible gift of reading thoughts and sometimes seeing the future (or is it the past?  Or nothing?) but it is proving to be a double edged sword.  Because of the Shining, he's seeing things in the hotel most people wouldn't see.  But also, because of the same Shining, he's afraid to tell his parents what he's seeing.

Jack is afraid of being a failure, afraid of losing his wife and his son.  And he is afraid of becoming his father.

Likewise, Wendy.  Her mother was a daunting figure in her childhood and they hardly speak now.  And it bothers her how much of her mother she sees in herself.

And the Overlook is feeding off of all these fears, amplifying them, and adding a few of its own.

It's really fun to watch King work in this one.  It's a psychological horror story as much as anything else.

And I'm loving it.

Feels Good Man

Getting back into the flow.

I've restarted reading the Shining.  Currently on chapter 4.  Still trying to determine how I'll handle blog posts.  I'm thinking two or three per week on set days, but maybe I'll just let the spirit move me.

I'm hoping to be able to dedicate enough time to this project once again that I can finish a book every two weeks or so, on average.  That may be way off base, but I need to set some sort of goal/pace for myself.

Don't want to have another extended absence...(of two years)

Anyway, wish me luck, as I continue my journey.

--B

Hey...I'm not dead.

So it's been two years.  Crazy how this life thing works.

I don't want to get into it too deeply, but I started having massive health issues shortly after my last post back in April of 2014.  Multiple hospital stays and multiple surgeries over the next 18 months...

What I'm basically saying is I put Stephen King (and this blog) away and focused on getting well.

I'm still not quite there (yeah, even 2 years later) but I'm ready to get back to it.

I'll probably start back up the beginning of The Shining, but I'll probably not blog until I've caught up to where I left off.

Bear with me as I get back into the swing, but updates will become a regular thing again.  I still intend to read through all of King.  But at this point...his writing is outpacing my reading.

So I better get cracking...